Search

Technical Discussion Group Forum

This forum is provided for user discussion. While Beacon EmbeddedWorks support staff and engineers participate, Beacon EmbeddedWorks does not guarantee the accuracy of all information within in the Technical Discussion Group (TDG).

The "Articles" forums provide brief Articles written by Beacon EmbeddedWorks engineers that address the most frequently asked technical questions.

To receive email notifications when updates are posted for a Beacon EmbeddedWorks product download, please subscribe to the TDG Forum of interest.

TDG Forum

PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 05 Feb 2004 11:43 PM by  elf-coastal@buici.com
Linux support
 3 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
shawn
New Member
New Member
Posts:


--
02 Dec 2003 06:18 PM
    For LH7A400 starter kit, does it support linux and if not, what is the roadmap to support linux?

    Shawn
    Anonymous
    Posts:


    --
    03 Dec 2003 07:20 AM
    Hello Shawn,

    Sharp has contracted the LH7A400-10 Linux BSP to a third party. A LH7A400-10 Linux pre-release is scheduled sometime before the end of December. Please contact Sharp for further information and availability.

    Regards,
    Andrew Wawra
    Tech Support
    Logic Product Development
    miket@logicpd.com
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:


    --
    04 Dec 2003 09:47 AM
    You might also want to ask on the arm-linux mailing list;
    I know there is at least one person working on an a400
    port to the card engine.
    mt
    elf-coastal@buici.com
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:


    --
    05 Feb 2004 11:43 PM
    > You might also want to ask on the arm-linux mailing list;
    > I know there is at least one person working on an a400
    > port to the card engine.

    Hmm. I wonder if that would be me.

    I've done some of the work to get the A400 to run a 2.6 kernel. I'm at a crossroads. There is a Linux BSP from Sharp for the A400. Is it supposed to run on the Logic PD CardEngine implementation?

    Personally, I'd rather finish the 2.6 work, but my client is getting edgy about it. If the Sharp Kernel is supposed to work as is then I'll have to use it, for now, to save time.

    Does anyone at LogicPD know about this?
    You are not authorized to post a reply.